Version numbering

For complex topics that regular users would not be interested in. For power users and database administrators.
Post Reply
User avatar
jordansparks
Site Admin
Posts: 5776
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 3:59 pm
Location: Salem, Oregon
Contact:

Version numbering

Post by jordansparks »

We're considering a new numbering scheme. We have so many version releases that it's too confusing. For example, 6.8, 7.8, 7.7, 6.9, 7.9, etc all get muddled and blurred together when I think about them. The year is now 2011, so I propose moving to 11.0, 11.1, 11.2, 12.0, 12.1, etc. The major release would indicate the year. The minor release would be incremental. The major version numbers are distinct and not shared with minor version numbers. It also gives us a general feel for how old a version is.
Jordan Sparks, DMD
http://www.opendental.com
User avatar
wjstarck
Posts: 949
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 7:18 am
Location: Keller, TX
Contact:

Re: Version numbering

Post by wjstarck »

That's a great idea. Ubuntu has used something similar and it's been very handy.
Cheers,

Bill Starck, DDS
Big Idea Software, LLC
Developer, EASy(Electronic Anesthesia System) for Open Dental
817-807-1709
TX, USA
User avatar
drtech
Posts: 1668
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 8:44 am
Location: Springfield, MO
Contact:

Re: Version numbering

Post by drtech »

I think it is a good idea...minor versions the month?
David Fuchs
Dentist - Springfield, MO
Smile Dental http://www.887-smile.com
User avatar
jordansparks
Site Admin
Posts: 5776
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 3:59 pm
Location: Salem, Oregon
Contact:

Re: Version numbering

Post by jordansparks »

Well, we decided against minor versions for month because that might include 10-12. Also, we might release more than one version in a month. Finally, we don't like skipping versions.
Jordan Sparks, DMD
http://www.opendental.com
Post Reply