Open Dental Forum

Jordan,
I just got back to work on coding a bit and noticed you decided to can the payment plan panels in favor of more space for the individual patient balances. I liked them, but if you don't then I can live without most of them. I do like the fact that you but the payment plan grid due $ in bold red. I did add back the TOTAL pt owes panel only if my options are on, so It shouldn't get in the way of anyone. I think this information is invaluable in our office so we really need it. (because it is too easy to look at the totals and think the Pt doesn't owe anything when it is all tied up in payment plans.) Is this method good with you?

I didn't look at it yet, but as long as it's in a "FuchsOptionsOn" clause and is something I can totally ignore, then yes, I'm ok with it. Please just try to keep it simple so that everything's not peppered with those Fuchs clauses.

thanks, I will keep that in mind as I try to make additions that everyone can use and wants most of the time...
btw, what did you do to increase the speed of the chart so much in v 5.7.15? it made is so much faster!

Added an index to the database for procedurelog.PlannedAptNum. There was also an appointment query that needed fiddling with.