Page 1 of 1
Wrap up 5.1
Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2007 2:17 pm
by jordansparks
Everyone wrap up all your loose ends. Version 5.1 will go to beta in a couple days. I know it doesn't seem like 5.1 is very different from 5.0, but there really have been some important changes. And we also need to have a beta version for various reasons.
Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2007 12:32 am
by fcarlier
OK. I did some work on ContrDocs -- mainly moved code to FileStore and call it from there. Shall I leave the code "as is" now, and continue work when we start with 5.2?
Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2007 8:04 am
by jordansparks
Well, I think we should plan for the release Wed night with the changes to SVN happening Thursday morning. It's Tues morning here right now. So that gives you about a day and a half. You could probably continue working for another day as long as it will be functional when you're done. It doesn't sound like you're doing anything that's going to cause major problems.
Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 6:41 pm
by drtech
just noticed a bug in the progNotes grid when you open recall. it hangs the program...trying to figure out what is wrong. It is in FillProgNotes
for(int i = 0;i < table.Rows.Count;i++) {
get a null exception or something.
It was working last time I looked at this (and have been running in v5.0 in our office with it on for quite a while) so did something change elsewhere that would have caused this problem?
Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 6:57 pm
by drtech
ok...i think the DataSetMain is not getting filled...b/c it thinks it is in the chart module?....not sure yet
the thing is it was working fine when I built it last month....
(i haven't paid attention to code changes since then, been busy with other things)
Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 10:50 pm
by jordansparks
I couldn't get it to hang.
Time to release version 5.1 beta.
Hmm..
Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 11:03 pm
by fdscadmin
I just noticed something interesting with the UnitQty field in the procedure log. When a procedure has a number of units (like anesthesia) the fee for that procedure needs to be multiplied by the # of units for it to make sense.
I started to make the changes, but I wanted to bring this up in case anyone has some input.
Currently, anywhere the "fee" is displayed I am adding an *if* statement to check for a value in the UnitQty field. If there is, it is multiplied before display.
Does this sound right path to take?
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 7:30 am
by drtech
hum...maybe something wrong with my database then...glad it is working, ready for 5.1!
