Open Dental Forum

Hello,

Would there be any objections if I'd "convert" more classes (e.g. Patient) to use the data access framework? The imaging-related classes use this framework already, and if I'm correctly there haven't surfaced any problems related to this.

"Converting" classes would always go hand-in-hand with adding unit tests to make sure they are correctly supported by the data access framework.

I'd like to make another compelling argument for using this framework. If you use it, you'll get a clear view of the Open Dental code that deviates from "standard" CRUD operations. That may make it easier to use, for example, the ADO.NET Entities Framework when it comes available (somewhere in 2008), which would simplify data access.

Frederik.

Wow! I hadn't hear about the ADO.NET Entities Framework before. I'm very excited about it. This could really boost speed of development. So yes, I strongly support this change. I have to confess that I will really miss the simplicity of the current 'TableType' classes. I frequently dive into them to look up the meaning of a particular table column. Did you notice how I altered the white space of the Document class to try to retain some of this utility? I tried to write a macro to automate this whitespace rearrangement, but did not have time to learn enough about macros. I'm not asking you to write that macro; I know that if I want it I will have to write it. But if you happen to have some experience with macros, and if you have a few moments, would you consider throwing me a few hints on how to approach it? At least I take comfort in the knowledge that I can always write the macro after the fact to clean up the white space for all the TableType classes in one fell swoop. That's a long way of saying, "Yes. Let's go for it."

If I understand it correctly, you want to group all the fields & properties together, and seperate these groups of field/property with a single, blank line.

I'll just update the current macros to do that. The changes to these macros should give you some hints on how to get started. Will that do?

I really appreciate it.

Have a look at Patient.cs. It should be formatted according to your coding guidelines. I also removed the duplicate code comments. They are only present on the Property itself; no longer on the field.

I will now proceed to write the unit tests for the Patient object. I assume that there will be some differences between the data type used in C# and MySQL, I'd like to resolve that.
Once that is done, the goal is to update Patients, so that the generic data access can be used.

If all goes well, I'll move on to other classes.

I'll be busy the coming days, so things will go rather slow.

It looks really great Frederik. Thanks.